Search for: "Arizona, State of v. Ponder"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2012, 8:32 am
And a wise Arizona lawyer pondered the same question as she considered the state of law firm trade names. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm
For twenty-three straight private sessions, from before the Term opened to shortly before it ended, the Court had before it the Arizona murder case of Ryan v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:32 am
DorfYesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Haaland v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:12 pm
That case is Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 10:07 am
Several criminal and related cases are on the docket.NY State Rifle & Pistol v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
The issue came up obliquely in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:11 pm
Last May, I pondered why we had not seen an appeal by the federal government in Haro v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
” At the Atlantic, Garrett Epps ponders whether and how the Arizona shootings might influence the Court’s Second Amendment jurisprudence. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
This is true in the Arizona RFRA, as well as the federal. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
United States cases and its more recent plurality opinion in Chavez v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:53 am
” posed in this Term’s Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 12:34 pm
Marion County Election Board (07-21) and Indiana Democratic Party v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm
Nope, the Ninth Circuit has stayed issuance of the mandate while it ponders nexus issues in another case.In June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously found that the Ninth had abused its discretion in a similar case, Ryan v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am
WINER, professor of law, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
Following a comment by Kevin Reitz, Sentencing Law and Policy also ponders whether the precedent Harris v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:42 am
It’s bad enough, both for substantive as well as factual reasons, that the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
The Court yesterday temporarily blocked Arizona from providing additional “matching funds” to candidates running for state office who are already receiving public financial support. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:35 am
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Sorenen looks at last week’s cert grant in McKinney v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
Arizona v. [read post]
